How does it work?

[shuklamojumder093]

Technical text analysis: AI identifies spelling, grammar and punctuation errors.
Structure assessment: checks whether the text follows the required format, such as introduction, development and conclusion in the case of dissertative-argumentative texts.
Personalized feedback: the platform points out specific improvements, for example, the use of connectives, argumentation and sociocultural repertoire.
Criteria-based scoring: the correction is made based on objective parameters, such as those described in the ENEM competencies.
Advantages of automated correction:
Speed: Provides instant results, saving indonesia mobile database the time they would spend manually correcting.
Consistency: ensures a standardized assessment, without subjectivity.
Detailed feedback: guides students to improve their writing skills based on the assessed criteria.
Scalability: allows the correction of a large number of essays, ideal for schools and preparatory courses.
You may also be interested in:

What is the best writing correction platform?
Website that corrects essays for free: discover CRIA .
Free online pre-university essay analysis .
Automated essay correction for schools
Correcting essays in ENEM is a demanding and complex process, both for teachers and for the exam evaluators. According to interviews conducted by Lesme (2021) and Starlles (2022), evaluators correct between 100 and 150 essays per day, taking 1.5 to 5 minutes for each text, depending on their experience.

In the classroom, this time can vary from 40 seconds to 10 minutes per essay, depending on the quality of the text, according to an analysis by Universia (2015).

Considering a class of 500 students, a teacher can take between 8 and 83 hours to correct all the essays, highlighting the enormous effort and time dedicated to this task.

Furthermore, studies such as that of Riolfi and Igreja (2010) show that only 6% of classroom time is dedicated to teaching writing, and many teachers end up giving collective feedback, failing to address individual problems.

Another study, conducted by Pinho et al. (2020), revealed that more than 60% of teachers dedicate less than 25% of their available time to teaching and providing feedback on essays.

In this sense, this scenario highlights the need for solutions that optimize teaching work, such as reducing the time spent on correction, allowing teachers to focus efforts on more strategic pedagogical activities.